Pointing out differences in color schemes is not exactly needed when most colors are not canon in JoJo. Otherwise, we'd have to flood the trivia section with random tidbits like how Jotaro is green in that picture, or how he's orange on ASB's boxart.
That said, we're working on adding a color scheme section to all the articles (check out Jotaro's page for example), so it may be appropriate there later on.
Hello, I am the one who has been trying to edit the section detailing the chronology of the Stand Arrows on the Bow and Arrow page. You reverted my edit that suggested that the "beetle" arrow that pierces Pucci is the same as the one later recovered by Polnareff, but I have reviewed the manga and would like to present my case.
The following panel is from pg. 10 of Ch. 552: Pronto! On The Line Part 2:
It is clearly shown later in Ch. 569 that Diavolo only uncovers six Arrows at the dig in Egypt. Here, five of the six Arrows are clearly visible. Of these, the three arrows furthest from us have no visible "tail" adornment below the arrowhead, unlike the beetle arrow. The two closest to us have a heart-shaped hole through them, also unlike the beetle arrow. Thus, the sixth and partially visible arrow must be the beetle Arrow. Here are some comparison images:
Knowing that there cannot be two arrows with this special design, we can conclude that the one seen stabbing Pucci in Ch. 721, which clearly has the beetle design, is the same as the one later recovered by Polnareff in Egpyt.
The designs are not entirely distinguishable on the last few arrows of the first picture. Even the supposed beetle one that's hidden is missing its side embossing. I wouldnt really call it definitive proof, though we may get a more clear image once the anime reaches that point.
Greetings my name is Senatedude14 I am a Moderator on the Overlord Wiki. We've prepared the wiki to begin affiliations with other Wikis and we would like to affiliate with another popular series. Here is a link:
Hello, I was wondering if it's possible to fix up any discrepancies between the JoJonium interviews seen at JoJonium/Special Interviews and the official translations published by Viz Media where relevant.
Compare what's on my userpage to the mainspace article in question. The wording is largely identical, but there are a few differences here and there. Then again, the official Viz translation uses "Hamon" for "Ripple".
Yes, this is also a necessary moment, I wanted to ask about this later. But thanks now. So what about interwiki in the articles? Can I add them? Simply I came across once that the administrator of another wiki did not want to add anything like this. So I ask not to do it without permission.
Hi MetallicKaiser; I'm Amanda with FANDOM's community development team! I wanted to see if you were interested in turning on Discussions.
In case you are unaware of the feature, Discussions was introduced last year to help communities engage with users and fans. It lives in its own space on the wiki and allows users to interact with other members of the community. It is also mobile friendly, and gives mobile users a chance to contribute and engage with the community, and possibly turn them into wiki editors as well. You can read more about Discussions here.
For more information on migrating forums to Discussions, you can check out this blog over on Community Central that explains everything in detail.
If you have some concerns, Discussions and Forums can exist side-by-side in case you do not want to migrate just yet. However, eventually all Forums will be migrated over to Discussions, so getting ahead of the curve is never a bad idea.
Let me know what you think, and if you want to proceed I can get the ball rolling.
As of now, I am a bit hesitant on migrating completely as a portion of our forums are constantly posted in and the sudden change would probably aggravate some of the users. I'd like to have the two exist simultaneously for now, in order to get a feel for discussions and prep the rest of the users for the eventual transition.
My only question at the moment is whether or not the current forums will be archived?
Great! I'll go ahead and turn on discussions. As for your question: the content is preserved in Discussions by the migration. So nothing is lost. They are archived in that sense.
On a technical level, the Forum content will still exist in the MediaWiki database for a while (perhaps even forever) but it's not accessible to users. So in that sense it's also archived. So we can always re-do the migration if something goes wrong, for example.